Jump to content

Photo

MintBox Mini - Bodhi Linux 4.4.0 vs Linux Mint 18.3


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 vvkozmenko

vvkozmenko

    Member

  • Members
  • 120 posts

Posted 11 January 2018 - 03:20 AM

Hi, guys,

 

I mentioned in the previous posts that I planned to switch from Linux Mint to Bodhi on my little desktop MintBox Mini.

 

I planned to make the switch in March but I had an occasion to do it today. Please see the screenshots below.

 

Linux Mint 18.3 - RAM usage was 960 MB

 

N0e8GkW.jpg

 

Bodhi Linux 4.4.9 (CPU and RAM usage - see below), actual CPU usage was 2% (it spiked a bit during taking the screenshot).

 

AMSUoMt.jpg

 

Bodhi has CPU usage SIX times less then Mint! WOW! RAM usage is about FOUR times less! YES!

 

The user experience after the switch is night and day. 

 

Everything flies. With Linux Mint, it took about 15-20 sec between clicking the Synaptic Manager icon and actual opening of the application.

 

With Bodhi, Synaptic launches within a fraction of a second.

 

The only thing that is not smooth is watching YouTube videos - but this is not because of Bodhi but because of the slow processor in the MintBox Mini (CPU usage goes as high as 70% while playing YouTube).

 

I am very impressed with Bodhi again (I've been using it on the Lenovo ThinkPad for about 8-9 months).

 

Last time I had this level of satisfaction from using a computer was in 2008-2009 with Snow Leopard running on a MacBook Pro (my experience with Apple had a constant decline since that time, and I am step-by-step phasing out from using ANY Apple products).

 

I wish I switched from the Mint to Bodhi earlier - I could have a fully usable desktop rather a crippled handicap. 

 

Big thanks to the Bodhi team. Keep up your excellent work.

 

Val





A big thank you to everyone who contributes to Bodhi Linux


#2 The waiter

The waiter

    Module Master

  • Developer
  • 1716 posts
  • LocationBanska Bystrica, Slovakia

Posted 11 January 2018 - 04:27 PM

Hello
Nice review. We know Bodhi is low on system resources. It explains the speed:)

Anyway, maybe I can help you with yt performance. In times I used my old Lenovo S12, I relied to smtube (with smplayer) or minitube apps for yt watching. Maybe it will fulfil your needs.

#3 sef

sef

    Bodhi Builder Wizard

  • Developer
  • 341 posts
  • LocationATL

Posted 11 January 2018 - 05:08 PM

That is exactly the reason I (and others I assume) use Bodhi. And it's also exactly the reason I wonder why more people don't use it.


Forum Rules (link)

---------------------------------------------------

Nothing is as simple as it seems at first, or as hopeless as it seems in the middle,

or as finished as it seems in the end.

---------------------------------------------------

"That's not how the force works..."  -- Han Solo


#4 BeGo

BeGo

    Member

  • Members
  • 163 posts
  • LocationBogor, Indonesia

Posted 12 January 2018 - 01:04 AM

Hi, guys,

 

I mentioned in the previous posts that I planned to switch from Linux Mint to Bodhi on my little desktop MintBox Mini.

 

I planned to make the switch in March but I had an occasion to do it today. Please see the screenshots below.

 

Linux Mint 18.3 - RAM usage was 960 MB

 

N0e8GkW.jpg

 

Bodhi Linux 4.4.9 (CPU and RAM usage - see below), actual CPU usage was 2% (it spiked a bit during taking the screenshot).

 

AMSUoMt.jpg

 

Bodhi has CPU usage SIX times less then Mint! WOW! RAM usage is about FOUR times less! YES!

 

The user experience after the switch is night and day. 

 

Everything flies. With Linux Mint, it took about 15-20 sec between clicking the Synaptic Manager icon and actual opening of the application.

 

With Bodhi, Synaptic launches within a fraction of a second.

 

The only thing that is not smooth is watching YouTube videos - but this is not because of Bodhi but because of the slow processor in the MintBox Mini (CPU usage goes as high as 70% while playing YouTube).

 

I am very impressed with Bodhi again (I've been using it on the Lenovo ThinkPad for about 8-9 months).

 

Last time I had this level of satisfaction from using a computer was in 2008-2009 with Snow Leopard running on a MacBook Pro (my experience with Apple had a constant decline since that time, and I am step-by-step phasing out from using ANY Apple products).

 

I wish I switched from the Mint to Bodhi earlier - I could have a fully usable desktop rather a crippled handicap. 

 

Big thanks to the Bodhi team. Keep up your excellent work.

 

Val

 

This are Mint - Cinnamon, right? That means the desktop already growing to Gnome level. :D



#5 graywizardlinux

graywizardlinux

    Bodhi Supporter

  • Members
  • 1090 posts

Posted 16 January 2018 - 02:37 PM

Mint IS a HOG! congrats on the switch!



#6 Oblio

Oblio

    Bodhi Team

  • Team
  • 240 posts

Posted 16 January 2018 - 03:43 PM

Back in my gaming days I experienced a average of 17% performance increase in frame rates by switching from another OS to Bodhi...a lot less overhead, etc.  Bodhi for the win!

 

***

 

I wonder how the new kernel is going to perform however (due to Meltdown and Spectre).  Supposed to be some pretty heavy memory table changes from what I have read.

 

Time will tell!


Xeon E3-1220 v3 3.1GHz Quad, ASRock Rack E3C224, 2x 8GB Kingston KVR16E11/8I DDR3-1600 ECC CL11 Intel Chips (Dual Channel), EVGA GeForce GTX 570, Samsung SM863 120GB OS SSD, 2x WD RED 3TB HDDs (Raid 0), Focusrite Scarlett 2i4, Antec Earthwatts EA-750 80 Plus Platinum 750w PSU - Bodhi 4.4.0 64

AMD Phenom II X4 940 3.0GHz Quad, Gigabyte GA-MA78GPM-DS2H, 2x 2GB Kingston KHX8500D2K2 DDR2-1066 (Dual Channel), EVGA GeForce GTX 570, Intel 40GB OS SDD, Seagate ST31000340AS 1TB HDD, Seagate STBD4000400 4TB HDD, EVGA 500w Bronze Plus 80+ PSU - Bodhi Linux 3.2.1 64


#7 auro

auro

    Member

  • Members
  • 35 posts
  • LocationStockholm, Sweden

Posted 16 January 2018 - 03:55 PM

@Oblio
It has been tested. Actually, it doesn't look that bad... unless you are running Centos, see
https://www.phoronix...t-spectre&num=1

#8 Oblio

Oblio

    Bodhi Team

  • Team
  • 240 posts

Posted 16 January 2018 - 04:14 PM

@Oblio
It has been tested. Actually, it doesn't look that bad... unless you are running Centos, see
https://www.phoronix...t-spectre&num=1

 

Thanks for the link!  The benchmarks actually look incredibly promising!

 

I read some articles when these risks were first identified and it was fairly doom and gloom...this looks great!


Xeon E3-1220 v3 3.1GHz Quad, ASRock Rack E3C224, 2x 8GB Kingston KVR16E11/8I DDR3-1600 ECC CL11 Intel Chips (Dual Channel), EVGA GeForce GTX 570, Samsung SM863 120GB OS SSD, 2x WD RED 3TB HDDs (Raid 0), Focusrite Scarlett 2i4, Antec Earthwatts EA-750 80 Plus Platinum 750w PSU - Bodhi 4.4.0 64

AMD Phenom II X4 940 3.0GHz Quad, Gigabyte GA-MA78GPM-DS2H, 2x 2GB Kingston KHX8500D2K2 DDR2-1066 (Dual Channel), EVGA GeForce GTX 570, Intel 40GB OS SDD, Seagate ST31000340AS 1TB HDD, Seagate STBD4000400 4TB HDD, EVGA 500w Bronze Plus 80+ PSU - Bodhi Linux 3.2.1 64





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users